SubjectCover

Question 446 of 869 in Inorganic Chemistry

Metals below carbon in the reactivity series

3 marks · Easy
(a)

State one economic reason why the extraction of iron using carbon is preferred over electrolysis.

[1 mark]
(b)

Write the balanced chemical equation for the reduction of iron(III) oxide with carbon.

[1 mark]
(c)

Identify which substance is reduced in this reaction.

[1 mark]

Work this out on paper, then compare with the answer and worked solution below. With a free account you can submit written answers for marking.

Show answer

(a) It is cheaper because less energy is used / uses cheaper reducing agent

(b) \ce{Fe2O3(s) + 3C(s) -> 2Fe(l) + 3CO(g)}

(c) Iron(III) oxide (Fe2O3)

Also accept: Energy cost as economic reason

Common mistakes: Naming CO2 as reduced; Cost being only 'cheaper' without justification

Show mark scheme and worked solution

Marking points

B1 (a) · 1 mark · Identifies cost of energy or reducing agent as the economic reason.

B1 (b) · 1 mark · Gives correct balanced symbol equation: Fe2O3 + 3C -> 2Fe + 3CO.

B1 (c) · 1 mark · Identifies iron(III) oxide or Fe2O3 as the substance reduced.

Worked solution

a) The process uses less energy, so it is cheaper than electrolysis. b) The balanced equation: Fe2O3(s) + 3C(s) -> 2Fe(l) + 3CO(g) c) The substance reduced is iron(III) oxide (Fe2O3).

Report a problem with this question
What's wrong?